Few days ago,
going to work in the rickshaw as usual, I was passing the entrance to
the crammed alleyways of the Nizamuddin basti, the Muslim village,
when I noticed that something had changed in the usual scenery: right
next to the entrance had been erected a vast advertisement by Diesel
Jeans. In a notably Muslim-dominated area,
the ad featured several topless men and
women wearing nothing but jeans looking jadedly at the passers by.
Right below the ad there was a man taking an early morning shower
with a garden hose, beside him were naked children playing and a
woman trying to start a bonfire. The ad had been erected to a level
where a regular pedestrian would not see it right away, as
it was slightly above the head. It was designed to reach the
glimpse of a person riding a vehicle, especially one where the driver
would sit relatively high, such as an SUV. The nonchalant gaze of the
mostly white models would never reach the beggars sitting below them,
or even the paanwallah facing away from the board. The
advertisement dominated their immediate surroundings, but
served no purpose to them.
The
extremities of Indian
economic inequality
never seem to cease to amaze the foreign traveller coming to India.
Exposure to it is unavoidable and it sends any fresh-off-the-plane
westerner on an instant guilt trip, while the Indian listens to the
shocked foreigner's lament quietly, almost amused. ”Oh my god, the poverty is just shocking!”.
For some, it's too much. A friend recalled an
anecdote of a young girl who was staying at hers as a couch surfer
armed with a suitcase full of sanitary products to give to poor
people she would see on the streets. After a first few days she
locked herself into the guestroom and sat there sobbing after having
seen too many beggars to her liking.
V.S.Naipaul
summarized the weltschmerz of the westerner painfully accurately in
his book "An
Area of Darkness",
a work written in 1964 has
not
lost a single bit of its relevance to this day:
"India
is the poorest country in the world. Therefore, to see its poverty is
to make an observation of no value; a thousand newcomers to the
country before you have seen and said as you. And not only newcomers.
Our own sons and daughters, when they return from Europe and America,
have spoken in your very words. Do not think that your anger and
contempt are marks of your sensitivity.
You
might have seen more: the smiles on the faces of the begging
children, that domestic group among the pavement sleepers waking in
the cool Bombay morning, father, mother and baby in a trinity of
love, so self contained that they are as private as if walls had
separated them from you: it is your gaze that violates them, your
sense of outrage that outrages them. You might have seen the boy
sweeping his area of pavement, spreading his mat, lying down;
exhaustion and undernourishment are in his tiny body and shrunken
face, but lying flat on his back, oblivious of you and the thousands
who walk past in the lane between sleepers' mats and house walls
bright with advertisements and election slogans, oblivious of the
warm, overbreathed air, he plays with a fatigued concentration with a
tiny pistol in blue plastic. It is your surprise, your anger that
denies him humanity.
But
wait, stay for six months. The winter will bring fresh visitors.
Their talk will also be of poverty; they too will show their anger.
You will agree; but deep down there will be annoyance; it will seem
to you then, too, that they are seeing only the obvious; and it will
not please to find your sensibility so accurately parodied."
In other words, overly
emotional accounts of encounters with poverty have the danger of
carnevalizing and thus dehumanizing the poor, depicting them as some
uniform group of people that dwell in their wretched existance with
no prospects of a better life. After staying for a bit longer in
India, something happens to you: Much to your surprise, you indeed find
yourself bored of backpackers' teary-eyed accounts of their
encounters with ”realities of life” during their Indian
experience. It is an uneasy feeling and you do not forgive yourself easily for feeling that way, but you begin to justify your newly
discovered numbness to poverty as recognition of your own limitations as
an individual. The legless woman shivering, wrapped in every rag she owns
on a winter morning greets you as you pass her in the rickshaw every
morning in the same intersection. The girl in her dirty and torn
flowery dress taps on the darkened car windows. They all become your
daily landscape.
As for the Indians listening to the cries of the foreigners, they have seen it all, maybe even too much. It is true that the economic reforms of early 90's have multiplied the size of the middle class and thus lifted a notable amount of people out of poverty and opened windows of opportunity beyond cultural barriers, such as in the case of Dalit entrepreneurs. However, for the more well-off of the
Indian society, poverty still seems to remain an uncomfortable truth, an ugly
stain in the shield of shining new India. For example last year Indian and foreign media channeled the public outrage when the Delhi authorities, with their idea of a "world class capital", were resorting to questionable measures while trying to hide the beggars from the international guests. The government may chastise
its people of the situation by calling the state of affairs "a national shame", but the general middle class public seems to rather shut its eyes from the whole situation. Pavan K Varma for example, in his book "the Great Indian Middle Class", is rather hard on his countrymen:
"The poor have been around for so long that they have become a part of the accepted landscape. Since they refused to go away, and could not be got rid of, the only other alternative was to take as little notice of them as possible. This myopia has its advantages: the less one noticed, the less reason one had to be concerned about social obligations; and the less one saw, the less one needed to be distracted from the heady pursuit of one's own material salvation. To get on in the world one had to restrict one's canvas, where all the discordance of other people's needs and conditions was best shut out."
" For the burgeoning and upwardly mobile middle class of India, such poverty has ceased to exist. It has ceased to exist, because it does not create in most of its members the slightest motivation to do something about it. Its existence is taken for granted. Its symptoms, which would revolt even the most sympathetic foreign observer, do not register any more. The general approach is to get on with one's life, to carve out a tiny island of well-being in a sea of deprivation"
Such a mindset may partly come from political disillusionment. Tepid interest in social reforms may partly be due to the fact that educated middle class Indians seem to have very little faith in politicians and government, whom they mostly regard as corrupt babus and gangsters. Unwilling to deal with such crowd, they remain more focused on minding their own business, beggars or no beggars.